Skip to main content
Outlaw Moscow
In February 2022, every international buyer Outlaw Moscow had built its identity around — including two PUMA collaborations sold through Selfridges and END — disappeared within weeks. The Moscow streetwear label kept working anyway, because the production site and showroom that made and sold its clothes had never belonged to anyone else.
Two cities, one owned supply chain
Built its own floor before the world stopped visiting
When Outlaw Moscow’s international sales severed within weeks of February 2022 — the US distributor, PUMA’s global retail network, Selfridges, and END, all gone — the brand did not have to open a factory or negotiate a production contract to keep working. It already owned one, in a Tatarstan town seven hundred kilometres away, running since 2014.
That fact, more than any single decision made after the rupture, is why Outlaw Moscow survived a shock that helped push roughly twenty Russian fashion brands out of business in 2025 alone, in a domestic market that contracted 5% that year to ₽4.2 trillion.
Built for an international audience from the start
Founded at the end of 2014 by two former classmates with roughly ₽100,000 in starting capital, Outlaw Moscow built its identity on international recognition almost from the start — production stayed in Naberezhnye Chelny (Набережные Челны), but the brand’s story was told in Milan and Paris showrooms, in a Nick Knight-mentored fashion film that won a £10,000 SHOWstudio prize in 2016, and, at its 2018 peak, in two PUMA collaborations sold through PUMA.com, PUMA stores, Selfridges, and END. Production of more than 1,000 items a year, in runs of thirty to forty pieces per drop, moved through a team that grew to roughly thirty people, including the Naberezhnye Chelny site. On paper, the brand’s registered legal entity told a different story entirely — a near-zero-revenue microenterprise with no listed employees, real commercial activity routed outside its filed accounts, a gap the brand’s own research flags as unresolved rather than papered over with an estimate.
The rupture
That gap between what the brand was building and what its paperwork recorded became irrelevant the moment the international channel it depended on disappeared. Sales through the US distributor and the international concept stores that had carried the brand since 2017 stopped. The PUMA relationship, Selfridges, END — the entire retail network built around the 2018 collaborations — went dark within weeks. For a brand that had spent eight years building its reputation abroad, February and March 2022 removed the audience it had been designing for.
The pivot inward
The response was not diversification into a new international market — there wasn’t time, and there wasn’t one obviously available. It was a full pivot inward, toward the domestic retail and e-commerce infrastructure Outlaw Moscow had owned since 2015, when it first opened its own showroom-studio at Moscow’s Elektrozavod (Электрозавод) creative cluster. The operating entity, OOO Autlo, was formally reactivated in February 2022 and registered as a microenterprise that July — paperwork catching up to a business that was reorganizing in real time. Outlaw Creative, the brand’s in-house studio arm, kept generating commercial work through the transition, producing a capsule for Xiaomi and serving as creative partner on a PUMA Unity project even as the brand’s core retail relationships collapsed. By late 2022 the brand had repositioned under a more domestic-facing identity, leaning into the heritage motifs — Roerich- and Bilibin-influenced neo-folk patterns — that had always been part of its visual language, now read by a Russian audience rather than an international one.
What survived, and what it proved
In 2023, in her first major interview about the reinvention, founder Dilyara Minrakhmanova (Диляра Минрахманова) stated the brand had grown “more than 100%” despite losing its international sales entirely — a self-reported figure, unaudited, and unchallenged in the available press coverage since. Whatever the precise number, the brand that emerged looked structurally different from the one that had built its name through Selfridges and PUMA: smaller in international reach, but running on infrastructure — a production site, a showroom, a retail footprint, an in-house creative studio — that no external partner controlled and no sanctions regime could revoke.
A second, slower test
That distinction mattered again in 2025, when the domestic correction that had been building since the rupture arrived in earnest. Roughly twenty Russian fashion brands closed that year as the market contracted 5% to ₽4.2 trillion. Outlaw Moscow’s survival through that second, slower-moving shock rested on the same asset that had carried it through the first: a business built to own its own floor, rather than one that had to wait for someone else to reopen a door.
The brand today operates as a leaner, domestically-oriented version of what it was in 2018 — still designing the outerwear-led, heritage-inflected collections that first drew international attention, still running its own production in Naberezhnye Chelny, but no longer dependent on a global retail relationship it does not control. Its positioning has stayed consistent through the rupture: an avant-garde end of Russian streetwear that the founders describe as deliberately expensive, refusing to design down to buyer demand, distinct from the mass-affordable labels that dominate the domestic market it now depends on entirely. Whether that premium positioning, built for an international audience, can sustain the kind of growth the brand once measured in PUMA collaborations and Selfridges placements remains an open question the sector’s own 2025 correction has not yet answered — one Outlaw Moscow is answering, for now, from a floor it never had to ask anyone else to build.
Researched 30 sources in English, Russian.